Headquarters lacks visibility
Activity indicators are available, but coordination problems and local constraints reach leadership late.
Multi-site steeringSeveral sites.
Several sites.
One shared view.
When teams are spread across locations, an overall average can hide different realities. Brainmood helps leadership understand collective dynamics by scope and track local and cross-site decisions within a common framework.
Your situationWhen the way work happens
When the way work happens
needs an adjustment.
For leaders of groups, networks and multi-site organizations coordinating headquarters, support functions and local teams.
Sites face different realities
The same direction meets resources, working rhythms and interfaces specific to each location.
Decisions become fragmented
Action plans accumulate without a shared view of what local managers own and what requires a central decision.
The process
From signal to decision.
Define the scopes
Choose useful sites, functions and consolidation levels. Check group sizes and confidentiality rules before segmenting results.
Establish a shared cadence
Organize collection cycles and readouts around the constraints of each site.
Read in context
Examine changes over time and across comparable scopes. Document differences in activity and participation.
Connect decisions
Separate local actions from cross-site decisions, assign owners and review progress with leadership.
The deliverablesA useful readout.
A useful readout.
Actions followed through.
Deliverables and cadence are specified according to the scope and offer agreed during scoping.
A consolidated view
Collective dynamics within the agreed scopes, reported according to the organizational structure and selected offer.
Priorities at each level
Actions owned by sites and decisions escalated to leadership, each with an owner and a deadline.
Shared follow-up
A history of decisions and actions, changes between periods and a synthesis for steering reviews.
Fictional example · For illustration
What a tracked decision can contain.
Fictional example: a network starts with two sites and one support function. The observations below illustrate how decisions can be assigned, without ranking site performance.
| Signal to explore | Possible decision | Owner · deadline · criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Instructions differ across sites | Clarify the shared rule and permitted local adaptations | Operations leadership · 30 days · instructions shared |
| One site waits for headquarters approvals | Define what can be decided locally | Leadership + site manager · 30 days · delegation documented |
| Several sites report a similar difficulty | Examine the relevant cross-site process | Support function · next review · proposed decision presented |
Scope and limitsA readout grounded
A readout grounded
in its context.
- Comparison requires consistent scopes and known context. Differences between sites do not establish a ranking of managers.
- Results are exclusively aggregated; a team that is too small cannot receive a readout that would identify its members.
- The number of sites, reporting depth and support depend on the scope and offer agreed together.
The trust frameworkUnderstand the method and confidentiality
Pseudonymous collection
Contributions collected without nominative profiles.
Aggregated readouts
Anti-reidentification thresholds checked against the agreed scope.
Collective interpretation
No individual readouts or psychological scoring.
A published experience
“A high-quality experience I recommend to mid-caps. The Brainmood team structures steering both organizationally and in tracking our teams, with concrete actions in real time.”
Frequently asked questions
Before you start.
Must every site join from the start?
No. A six-month pilot can cover one or several sites. The scope should allow a real governance decision to be tested while meeting the conditions for aggregated reporting.
Can all sites be compared directly?
Useful comparisons account for activity, group size, periods and participation. Brainmood provides consolidated readouts and views over time; interpretation must remain grounded in context.
Which offer fits a multi-site organization?
The choice depends on employee numbers, the number of entities and the governance required. Evolution and Structure include cross-team or multi-team steering; large organizations with 400 or more employees receive a tailored quote.
The first conversation
Start with your situation.
Thirty minutes to understand your context, identify a decision to inform and check the right scope.